Question Solved1 Answer Need help with the last question! A certain gasoline engine has an efficiency of 34.0%; that is, it converts into useful work 34.0% of the heat generated by burning a fuel. Power Correct. If the engine consumes 1.80 L/h of a gasoline with a heating value of 3.25 x 104 kJ/L, how much power does it provide? Calculate the answer in kilowatts and horsepower. 5.53 kW 7.406 hp e Textbook and Media Hint Attempts: 1 of 3 used Mixture Consumption This is a scaling/unit conversion problem; be careful with units. Suppose the fuel is changed to include 85.0% ethanol by volume. The heating value of ethanol is approximately 2.34 x 104 kJ/L and volumes of gasoline and ethanol are assumed to be additive. At what rate (L/h) does the fuel mixture have to be consumed to produce the same power as gasoline (consumed at 1.80 L/h)? i ! L/h

Q1 (60p) To find how much heat is required to bring a kettle of water to its boiling point, you are asked to calculate the specific heat of water at 61°C. The specific heat of water is given as a function of time in the Table as given below. Table: Specific heat of water as a function of temperature Temperature, T Specific heat, Cp J/kg C 4179 42 52 82 4186 4199 4217 100 Determine the value of the specific heat at T =61°C using appropriate interpolation technique.

Choi Company manufactures two skin care lotions, Smooth Skin and Silken Skin, from a joint process. The joint costs incurred are $400,000 for a standard production run that generates 110,000 pints of Smooth Skin and 140,000 pints of Silken Skin. Smooth Skin sells for $2.80 per pint, while Silken Skin sells for $4.00 per pint. Required: 1. Assuming that both products are sold at the split-off point, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Smooth Skin using the relative sales value method? 2. If no separable costs are incurred after the split-off point, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Silken Skin using the physical measure method? 3. If separable processing costs beyond the split-off point are $1.50 per pint for Smooth Skin and $1.00 per pint for Silken Skin, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Silken Skin using a net realizable value method? 4. If separable processing costs beyond the split-off point are $1.50 per pint for Smooth Skin and $1.00 per pint for Silken Skin, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Smooth Skin using a physical measure method? (For all requirements, do not round intermediate calculations. Round final answers to nearest whole dollar amounts.) 1. 2. Relative sales value method - Smooth Skin Physical measure method - Silken Skin Net realizable value method - Silken Skin Physical measure method - Smooth Skin 3. 4.

The effect of temperature on the rate of a reaction was studied and the following data obtained: k (s¹) T (°C) 7.98x10-4 9 1.16x10-3 14 1.79x10-3 20 2.54x10-3 25 4.93×10-3 35 7.64x10-3 42 1.23x10-² 50 1.47x10-2 53 It is known that the variation of the rate constant k with the absolute temperature T is described by the Arrhenius equation: k = A exp [(-E₂ The effect of temperature on the rate of a reaction was studied and the following data obtained: k (s¹) T (°C) 7.98x10-4 9 1.16x10-3 14 1.79x10-3 20 2.54x10-3 25 4.93×10-3 35 7.64x10-3 42 1.23x10-² 50 1.47x10-2 53 It is known that the variation of the rate constant k with the absolute temperature T is described by the Arrhenius equation: k = A exp [(-E₂ )/(RT)] where E, is the activation energy, R is the universal gas constant and A is the pre-exponential factor (units of the rate constant). Taking the natural logarithm of both sides affords: Ea In k = In A- RT For a plot of y = Ink versus x = 1/T, calculate the slope of the best straight line using linear regression.

Choi Company manufactures two skin care lotions, Smooth Skin and Silken Skin, from a joint process. The joint costs incurred are \( \$ 410,000 \) for a standard production run that generates 290,000 pints of Smooth Skin and 130,000 pints of Silken Skin. Smooth Skin sells for \( \$ 2.50 \) per pint, while Silken Skin sells for \( \$ 4.00 \) per pint. Choi Company manufactures two skin care lotions, Smooth Skin and Silken Skin, from a joint process. The joint costs incurred are \( \$ 410,000 \) for a standard production run that generates 290,000 pints of Smooth Skin and 130,000 pints of Silken Skin. Smooth Skin sells for \( \$ 2.50 \) per pint, while Silken Skin sells for \( \$ 4.00 \) per pint. Requlred: 1. Assuming that both products are sold at the split-off point, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Smooth Skin using the relative sales value method? 2. If no separable costs are incurred after the split-off point, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Silken Skin using the physical measure method? 3. If separable processing costs beyond the split-off point are \( \$ 1.60 \) per pint for Smooth Skin and \( \$ 1.30 \) per pint for Silken Skin, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Silken Skin using a net realizable value method? 4. If separable processing costs beyond the split-off point are \( \$ 1.60 \) per pint for Smooth Skin and \( \$ 1.30 \) per pint for Silken Skin, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Smooth Skin using a physical measure method? (For all requlrements, do not round Intermedlate calculations. Round flnel answers to nearest whole doller amounts.)

The initial mass of a certain species of fish is 2 million tons. The mass of fish, if left alone, would increase at a rate proportional to the mass, with a proportionality constant of 4/yr. However, commercial fishing removes fish mass at a constant rate of 11 million tons per year. When will all the fish be gone? If the fishing rate is changed so that the mass of fish remains constant, what should that rate be?

The initial mass of a certain species of fish is 2 million tons. The mass of fish, if left alone, would increase at a rate proportional to the mass, with a proportionality constant of 5/yr. However, commercial fishing removes fish mass at a constant rate of 12 million tons per year. When will all the fish be gone? If the fishing rate is changed so that the mass of fish remains constant, what should that rate be? When will all the fish be gone? Inco The fish will all be gone in years. (Round to three decimal places as needed.)