# Question Solved1 AnswerConsider the table given next, which tracks several performance indicators for Intel desktop processors since 2010. The "Tech" column shows the minimum feature size of each processor's fabrication process. Assume that the die size has remained relatively constant and the number of transistors that comprise each processor scales at (1/ t^2), where t = the minimum feature size. Thus, consider the improvement of the number of transistors for the "Tech" column. For each performance indicator, calculate the average rate of improvement in a ten-year period from 2010 to 2019, as well as the number of years required to double each at that corresponding rate. Round the improvement rate per year to 1 percent and the number of years to an integer. Table 1.15.1: COD MIPS HW 1.6 Table. Desktop processor Year Tech Max. Clock Speed (GHz) Integer IPC/ core Cores Max. DRAM Bandwidth (GB/s) SP floating point (Gflop/s) L3 Cache (MiB) Westmere i7- 620 2010 32 3.33 4 2 17.1 107 4 Ivy Bridge i7- 3770k 2013 22 3.90 6 4 25.6 250 8 Broadwell i7- 6700K 2015 14 4.20 8 4. 34.1 269 8 Kaby Lake i7- 7700K 2017 14 4.50 8 4 38.4 288 8 Coffee Lake i7- 9700K 2019 14 4.90 00 4 42.7 627 12 Imp./year _% _ _% _% _% __% _% _% Doubles every _years --years --years _years -years _years _years Feedback?

Consider the table given next, which tracks several performance indicators for Intel desktop processors since 2010.

The "Tech" column shows the minimum feature size of each processor's fabrication process. Assume that the die size has remained relatively constant and the number of transistors that comprise each processor scales at (1/ t^2), where t = the minimum feature size. Thus, consider the improvement of the number of transistors for the "Tech" column.

For each performance indicator, calculate the average rate of improvement in a ten-year period from 2010 to 2019, as well as the number of years required to double each at that corresponding rate.

Round the improvement rate per year to 1 percent and the number of years to an integer.

Transcribed Image Text: Table 1.15.1: COD MIPS HW 1.6 Table. Desktop processor Year Tech Max. Clock Speed (GHz) Integer IPC/ core Cores Max. DRAM Bandwidth (GB/s) SP floating point (Gflop/s) L3 Cache (MiB) Westmere i7- 620 2010 32 3.33 4 2 17.1 107 4 Ivy Bridge i7- 3770k 2013 22 3.90 6 4 25.6 250 8 Broadwell i7- 6700K 2015 14 4.20 8 4. 34.1 269 8 Kaby Lake i7- 7700K 2017 14 4.50 8 4 38.4 288 8 Coffee Lake i7- 9700K 2019 14 4.90 00 4 42.7 627 12 Imp./year _% _ _% _% _% __% _% _% Doubles every _years --years --years _years -years _years _years Feedback?
More
Transcribed Image Text: Table 1.15.1: COD MIPS HW 1.6 Table. Desktop processor Year Tech Max. Clock Speed (GHz) Integer IPC/ core Cores Max. DRAM Bandwidth (GB/s) SP floating point (Gflop/s) L3 Cache (MiB) Westmere i7- 620 2010 32 3.33 4 2 17.1 107 4 Ivy Bridge i7- 3770k 2013 22 3.90 6 4 25.6 250 8 Broadwell i7- 6700K 2015 14 4.20 8 4. 34.1 269 8 Kaby Lake i7- 7700K 2017 14 4.50 8 4 38.4 288 8 Coffee Lake i7- 9700K 2019 14 4.90 00 4 42.7 627 12 Imp./year _% _ _% _% _% __% _% _% Doubles every _years --years --years _years -years _years _years Feedback?