Question Solved1 Answer Pre-Equilibria Conditions in Reaction Mechanisms CO(g) + Cl2(g) → CoCl2(9) The above reaction obeys the mechanism: Cl2 2C1 Fast equilibrium k Cl + CO COCI Fast equilibrium COCI + Cl2 ki, COCIZ + C1 Slow 2C1 Cl2 Fast Consider each of the following expressions and select "Yes" or "No" to indicate which represent a correct statement of the rate law that is consistent with the given mechanism. d[CoCl2]/dt = k[Cl2][CO] v d[COCI2]/dt = k[CO][C1]3/2 v [CoCl21/dt = K[CO][Cl]3/2 -d[Co]/dt = k[CO](Cl2]3/2 v [CoCl21/dt = K[CO][Cl]3 v d[COCI2]/dt = k[Cl2]1/2[co] 1 pts Submit Answer Tries 0/5 Suppose that: kq/k_1 = 1x10-2 mol L-4, Kz/k.2 = 1x106 L mol-2, kg = 1x10-4 L mol-1 3-1, and ka = 1x103 L mol-1 5-1. What would be the value of the overall rate constant, k, including the correct units? If you are having trouble getting the units correctly formatted, have a close look at the examples. 1 pts Submit Answer Units required. Tries 0/5 Previous Tries

please solve with explanation Thanking you 22.5-6. Absorption of Ammonia in a Packed Tower. A gas stream contains 4.0 mol % NH3 and its ammonia content is reduced to 0.5 mol % in a packed absorption tower at 293 K and 1.013 * 105 Pa. The inlet pure-water flow is 68.0 kg mol/h and the total inlet gas flow is 57.8 kg mol/h. The tower diameter is 0.747 m. The film mass-transfer coefficients are k a a = 0.0739 kg mol/s . m3 . mol frac and k a mol/s . m3 . mol frac. Using the design methods for dilute gas mixtures, do as follows: a. Calculate the tower height using ka. b. Calculate the tower height using Ka. Ans. (a) z = 2.362 m (7.75 ft) m . .

Choi Company manufactures two skin care lotions, Smooth Skin and Silken Skin, from a joint process. The joint costs incurred are $400,000 for a standard production run that generates 110,000 pints of Smooth Skin and 140,000 pints of Silken Skin. Smooth Skin sells for $2.80 per pint, while Silken Skin sells for $4.00 per pint. Required: 1. Assuming that both products are sold at the split-off point, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Smooth Skin using the relative sales value method? 2. If no separable costs are incurred after the split-off point, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Silken Skin using the physical measure method? 3. If separable processing costs beyond the split-off point are $1.50 per pint for Smooth Skin and $1.00 per pint for Silken Skin, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Silken Skin using a net realizable value method? 4. If separable processing costs beyond the split-off point are $1.50 per pint for Smooth Skin and $1.00 per pint for Silken Skin, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Smooth Skin using a physical measure method? (For all requirements, do not round intermediate calculations. Round final answers to nearest whole dollar amounts.) 1. 2. Relative sales value method - Smooth Skin Physical measure method - Silken Skin Net realizable value method - Silken Skin Physical measure method - Smooth Skin 3. 4.

The effect of temperature on the rate of a reaction was studied and the following data obtained: k (s¹) T (°C) 7.98x10-4 9 1.16x10-3 14 1.79x10-3 20 2.54x10-3 25 4.93×10-3 35 7.64x10-3 42 1.23x10-² 50 1.47x10-2 53 It is known that the variation of the rate constant k with the absolute temperature T is described by the Arrhenius equation: k = A exp [(-E₂ The effect of temperature on the rate of a reaction was studied and the following data obtained: k (s¹) T (°C) 7.98x10-4 9 1.16x10-3 14 1.79x10-3 20 2.54x10-3 25 4.93×10-3 35 7.64x10-3 42 1.23x10-² 50 1.47x10-2 53 It is known that the variation of the rate constant k with the absolute temperature T is described by the Arrhenius equation: k = A exp [(-E₂ )/(RT)] where E, is the activation energy, R is the universal gas constant and A is the pre-exponential factor (units of the rate constant). Taking the natural logarithm of both sides affords: Ea In k = In A- RT For a plot of y = Ink versus x = 1/T, calculate the slope of the best straight line using linear regression.

Choi Company manufactures two skin care lotions, Smooth Skin and Silken Skin, from a joint process. The joint costs incurred are \( \$ 410,000 \) for a standard production run that generates 290,000 pints of Smooth Skin and 130,000 pints of Silken Skin. Smooth Skin sells for \( \$ 2.50 \) per pint, while Silken Skin sells for \( \$ 4.00 \) per pint. Choi Company manufactures two skin care lotions, Smooth Skin and Silken Skin, from a joint process. The joint costs incurred are \( \$ 410,000 \) for a standard production run that generates 290,000 pints of Smooth Skin and 130,000 pints of Silken Skin. Smooth Skin sells for \( \$ 2.50 \) per pint, while Silken Skin sells for \( \$ 4.00 \) per pint. Requlred: 1. Assuming that both products are sold at the split-off point, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Smooth Skin using the relative sales value method? 2. If no separable costs are incurred after the split-off point, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Silken Skin using the physical measure method? 3. If separable processing costs beyond the split-off point are \( \$ 1.60 \) per pint for Smooth Skin and \( \$ 1.30 \) per pint for Silken Skin, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Silken Skin using a net realizable value method? 4. If separable processing costs beyond the split-off point are \( \$ 1.60 \) per pint for Smooth Skin and \( \$ 1.30 \) per pint for Silken Skin, how much of the joint cost of each production run is allocated to Smooth Skin using a physical measure method? (For all requlrements, do not round Intermedlate calculations. Round flnel answers to nearest whole doller amounts.)

The initial mass of a certain species of fish is 2 million tons. The mass of fish, if left alone, would increase at a rate proportional to the mass, with a proportionality constant of 4/yr. However, commercial fishing removes fish mass at a constant rate of 11 million tons per year. When will all the fish be gone? If the fishing rate is changed so that the mass of fish remains constant, what should that rate be?

The initial mass of a certain species of fish is 2 million tons. The mass of fish, if left alone, would increase at a rate proportional to the mass, with a proportionality constant of 5/yr. However, commercial fishing removes fish mass at a constant rate of 12 million tons per year. When will all the fish be gone? If the fishing rate is changed so that the mass of fish remains constant, what should that rate be? When will all the fish be gone? Inco The fish will all be gone in years. (Round to three decimal places as needed.)