Last paragraphs of chapter 2
The empirical grounds of Cuvier’s theory have, by now, largely
been disproved. The physical evidence that convinced him of a
“revolution” just prior to recorded history (and that the English
interpreted as proof of the Deluge) was, in reality, debris left
behind by the last glaciation. The stratigraphy of the Paris basin
reflects not sudden “irruptions” of water but rather gradual
changes in sea level and the effects of plate tectonics. On all
these matters Cuvier was, we now know, wrong. At the same time,
some of Cuvier’s most wild-sounding claims have turned out to be
surprisingly accurate. Life on earth has been disturbed by
“terrible events,” and “organisms without number” have been their
victims. Such events cannot be explained by the forces, or
“agents,” at work in the present. Nature does, on occasion, “change
course,” and at such moments, it is as if the “thread of
operations” has been broken. Meanwhile, as far as the American
mastodon is concerned, Cuvier was to an almost uncanny extent
correct. He decided that the beast had been wiped out five or six
thousand years ago, in the same “revolution” that had killed off
the mammoth and the Megatherium. In fact, the American mastodon
vanished around thirteen thousand years ago. Its demise was part of
a wave of disappearances that has come to be known as the megafauna
extinction. This wave coincided with the spread of modern humans
and, increasingly, is understood to have been a result of it. In
this sense, the crisis Cuvier discerned just beyond the edge of
recorded history was us.
In the last paragraph of chapter 2,( Elizabeth Kohlbert
says that the paleontologist was right - that there was a great
event just before recorded time. What caused this great
event? (Type on word in the blank - the one thing
that caused the event. Spell the word correctly!)